Library of the U.S. Courts for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Text Size:
  • Decrease font size
  • Reset font size
  • Increase font size
  • Home
  • Court Resources
    • Courts in the Seventh Circuit
    • Federal Court Rules
    • Local Court Rules
    • U.S. Courts
    • Accessing Closed Files
    • Judicial Glossary
    • Understanding the Federal Courts
  • Court
    Opinions
    • Seventh Circuit Opinions
    • Case Summaries
    • Case Citation Lists
    • Notable Oral Arguments
    • Archived URLs From Court Opinions
    • 7th Circuit Cases Granted Certiorari
  • Court
    History
    • Chronology of Judges
    • History of the Judiciary
    • Northern District of IL History
    • History of the Seventh Circuit 1841-1941
    • Oral Histories of Judges
    • Judicial Memorials
    • Judge Biographies
  • Library
       Resources
    • Recommended Web Sites
    • Chicago
    • East St. Louis
    • Indianapolis
    • Madison
    • Milwaukee
    • South Bend
    • Library Directory

Seventh Circuit Cases Granted Certiorari

This is a status report and a subsequent history of Seventh Circuit cases which have been granted certiorari. It does not include cases for which the Supreme Court has issued a summary disposition.

2012-2013 Supreme Court Term
Return to list of Court Terms. 

Case Name: Chaidez v. United States

   
Affirmed  
S. Ct. Docket:
11-820
Cert. Granted:
4/30/2012
Argument Date:
10/30/2012
Question Presented:
The question presented is whether Padilla applies to
persons whose convictions became final before its announcement.
7th Cir. Opinion:
10-3623 655 F.3d 684
7th Cir. Panel:
Bauer, Flaum and Williams
S. Ct. Opinion:
11-820
Date Decided:
2/20/2013
 
   
Case Name: Vance v. Ball State University
   
   
S. Ct. Docket:
11-556
Cert. Granted:
6/25/2012
Argument Date:
11/26/2012
Question Presented:
Whether, as the Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits have held, the Faragher
and Ellerth "supervisor" liability rule (i) applies to harassment by those whom the
employer vests with authority to direct and oversee their victim's daily work, or, as
the First, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits have held (ii) is limited to those harassers
who have the power to "hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline" their
victim.
7th Cir. Opinion:
08-3568
7th Cir. Panel:
Wood, Bauer, Sykes
S. Ct. Opinion:
 
Date Decided:
 

   
Case Name: Peugh v. United States
   
   
S. Ct. Docket:
12-62
Cert. Granted:
11/9/2012
Argument Date:
2/26/2013
Question Presented:
Does a sentencing court violate the Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause by using the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing rather than those in effect at the time of the offense if the newer guidelines create a significant risk that the defendant will receive a longer sentence?
7th Cir. Opinion:
10-2184
7th Cir. Panel:
Rovner, Wood and Williams
S. Ct. Opinion:
 
Date Decided: