Library of the U.S. Courts for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Text Size:
  • Decrease font size
  • Reset font size
  • Increase font size
  • Home
  • Court Resources
    • Courts in the Seventh Circuit
    • Federal Court Rules
    • Local Court Rules
    • U.S. Courts
    • Accessing Closed Files
    • Judicial Glossary
    • Understanding the Federal Courts
  • Court
    Opinions
    • Seventh Circuit Opinions
    • Case Summaries
    • Case Citation Lists
    • Notable Oral Arguments
    • Archived URLs From Court Opinions
    • 7th Circuit Cases Granted Certiorari
  • Court
    History
    • Chronology of Judges
    • History of the Judiciary
    • Northern District of IL History
    • History of the Seventh Circuit 1841-1941
    • Oral Histories of Judges
    • Judicial Memorials
    • Judge Biographies
  • Library
       Resources
    • Recommended Web Sites
    • Chicago
    • East St. Louis
    • Indianapolis
    • Madison
    • Milwaukee
    • South Bend
    • Library Directory

Seventh Circuit Cases Granted Certiorari

This is a status report and a subsequent history of Seventh Circuit cases which have been granted certiorari. It does not include cases for which the Supreme Court has issued a summary disposition.

2017-2018 Supreme Court Term
Return to list of Court Terms.

Case Name: Epic Systems v. Lewis

Reversed and remanded

S. Ct. Docket: 16-285 (consolidated with 16-300 and 16-307)  
Cert. Granted:1/13/2017  
Argument Date:10/2/22017  
Question Presented: Whether an agreement that requires an employer and an employee to resolve employment-related disputes through individual arbitration, and waive class and collective proceedings, is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, notwithstanding the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act.  
7th Cir. Opinion: 15-2997  
7th Cir. Panel: Chief Judge Wood, Rovner, Blakey  
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-285
Date Decided: 5/21/2018

Case Name: Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago

Vacated and remanded

S. Ct. Docket: 16-658  
Cert. Granted: 2/27/2017  
Argument Date:10/10/2017  
Question Presented: Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(C) can deprive a court of appeals of jurisdiction over an appeal that is statutorily timely, as the Second, Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits have concluded, or whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(C) is instead a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule because it is not derived from a statute, as the Ninth and D.C. Circuits have concluded, and therefore subject to equitable considerations such as forfeiture, waiver, and the unique-circumstances doctrine.  
7th Cir. Opinion: 15-3764  
7th Cir. Panel: Posner, Sykes and District Judge Yandle  
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-658
Date Decided: 11/8/2017

Case Name: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting

Affirmed and remanded

S. Ct. Docket: 16-784  
Cert. Granted: 5/1/2017  
Argument Date: 11/6/2017  
Question Presented: Whether the safe harbor of Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits avoidance of a transfer made by or to a financial institution, without regard to whether the institution has a beneficial interest in the property transferred, consistent with decisions from the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 8th, and 10th Circuits, but contrary to the decisions from the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 7th and 11th Circuits.  
7th Cir. Opinion: 15-3388  
7th Cir. Panel: Chief Judge Wood, Posner, Rovner  
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-784  
Date Decided: 2/27/2018

Case Name: Gill v. Whitford

Vacated and remanded

S. Ct. Docket: 16-1161  
Cert. Granted: 6/19/2017 (Jurisdiction postponed to hearing the case on the merits)  
Argument Date: 10/3/2017  
Question Presented:(1) Whether the district court violated Vieth v. Jubelirer when it held that it had the authority to entertain a statewide challenge to Wisconsin's redistricting plan, instead of requiring a district-by-district analysis; (2) whether the district court violated Vieth when it held that Wisconsin's redistricting plan was an impermissible partisan gerrymander, even though it was undisputed that the plan complies with traditional redistricting principles; (3) whether the district court violated Vieth by adopting a watered-down version of the partisan-gerrymandering test employed by the plurality in Davis v. Bandemer; (4) whether the defendants are entitled, at a minimum, to present additional evidence showing that they would have prevailed under the district court's test, which the court announced only after the record had closed; and (5) whether partisan-gerrymandering claims are justiciable.  
Panel. Opinion: 3:15-cv-421 (Western District of Wisconsin)  
Panel: Judge Ripple, Circuit Judge, Judges Crabb and Griesbach, District Judges  
Citation: 281 F. Supp.3d 837
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-1661
Date Decided: 6/18/2018

Case Name: Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Affirmed

S. Ct. Docket: 16-534  
Cert. Granted: 6/27/2017  
Argument Date: 12/4/2017  
Question Presented: Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1610(g) provides a freestanding attachment immunity exception that allows terror victim judgment creditors to attach and execute upon assets of foreign state sponsors of terrorism regardless of whether the assets are otherwise subject to execution under section 1610.  
7th Cir. Opinion: 14-1935  
7th Cir. Panel: Judge Bauer and Sykes, Circuit Judges, and Chief District Judge Reagan  
Citation: 830 F.3d 470 (2016)  
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-534  
Date Decided: 2/21/2018  

Case Name: Murphy v. Smith

Affirmed

S. Ct. Docket: 16-1067  
Cert. Granted: 8/25/2017  
Argument Date: 12/6/2017  
Question Presented: The question presented is whether the parenthetical phrase in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1997e(d)(2) "not to exceed 25 percent" means any amount up to 25 percent (as four circuits hold), or whether it means exactly 25 percent (as the Seventh Circuit holds).  
7th Cir. Opinion:15-3384  
7th Cir. Panel: Judges Bauer, Manion and Hamilton  
Citation: 844 F.3d 653
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-1067
Date Decided: 2/21/2018

Case Name: Janus v. Am. Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31

Reversed and remanded

S. Ct. Docket: 16-1466  
Cert. Granted: 9/28/2017  
Argument Date: 2/26/2018  
Question Presented: Should Abood be overruled and public sector agency fee arrangements declared unconstitutional under the First Amendment?  
7th Cir. Opinion: 16-3638  
7th Cir. Panel: Judges Posner, Sykes and Hamilton  
Citation: 851 F.3d 746
S. Ct. Opinion: 16-1466
Date Decided: 6/27/2018

Case Name: Wisconsin Central Ltd, v. United States

Reversed and remanded

S. Ct. Docket: 17-530  
Cert. Granted: 1/12/2018  
Argument Date: 4/16/2018  
Question Presented: Whether stock that a railroad transfers to its employees is taxable under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, 26 U.S.C.
§ 3231(e)(l).
 
7th Cir. Opinion: 16-3303  
7th Cir. Panel: Posner, Manion and Hamilton  
Citation: 856 F.3d 490
S. Ct. Opinion: 17-530
Date Decided: 6/21/2018